It's just come to light that for more than a year our Clerk has not been using the laptop bought out of public funds and provided solely for our council's use. Instead, the Clerk has been using their own computer for our council business. This was not brought to the council's attention as an agenda item to be addressed at any convened meeting during the Clerk's tenure. The council bought its own laptop along with a combined printer/scanner which we now find out is used by the Clerk for both our council's work and the other much larger council they are Clerk to - again without this fact being made clear to or agreed by our council.
Is this common practice? Is it a proper way to administer council business? Are there any security/data protection/insurance/other risks in using a private computer for council work? Should it be challenged?
I recall that our ALC provided special grants available for a short period of time a couple of years ago for councils to buy sole-use laptops on the grounds that private computers should not be used by Clerks for council business, and that Clerks should never use one computer for several councils' business. Each council should keep separate its own computer for safety and security reasons, particularly with concerns about protecting GDPR.
This appears to have been backed up by our Internal Auditor at the time, who wrote much the same in his annual accounts report, and made the recommendation, taken up almost immediately afterwards by the council, that the council should own and use a completely separate set of office equipment. Our Clerk claims they have it on good authority that they have every right to choose whether they use their own laptop or that owned by the council, and they have chosen to use their private laptop. Is this correct?