Office equipment budget from year 2019 2020

Question

Hello all, back in January 2020 the clerk told the council that she’s having a new office built at her home which she moved into a year or so earlier and needed new office equipment for it, what she has is old and tatty, at that same meeting the council set a budget of £1000 for new office equipment, within a week she had a new printer (old one broken?) it seems this wasn’t included in this budget, why I asked? because it wasn’t I was told, fast forward to end of April 2021 the clerk sends out an email saying she wants to order a new P.C. Filing cabinets, office chair, computer programs etc, totals some £1186:00 and can she order speakers and web cam on top? most councillors seemed happy to let her do this, I said the budget was set at £1000 only (set 16 months earlier in a previous year’s budget) is it ok to do this or not? ie go over budget and what should the procedure be as we are in a totally different budget year?

Answer 1

Unless the filing cabinets are broken, I think she should not be allowed to buy new ones.  A good clerk should be seeking to move to a paperless office and not seeking to increase paper storage. Only signed copies of minutes need to be retained in hard copy form.  Other paper records should be scanned and indexed.  Any call for office equipment finance should be itemised and checks should be made to ensure the old PC lacks sufficient memory, processor speed and hard disc capacity to justify renewal.  The clerk should provide a spec for the new PC & software installed on it  too so that cllrs are not paying for something that is way overspecified.  For example there are various incarnations of Office 365 - is the Clerk using that now, and has anyone read the terms of licensing f it?

Comments

When our council was in the process of purchasing a new laptop, we were advised by our clerk that there was no data required to be transferred to the replacement laptop as everything was "in the cloud", so surely in this case with the correct protocols in place it should be possible to share certain IT equipment?

---

Cloud storage is certainly a bonus and probably what we'll all be doing in a few years' time, so if you are able to store absolutely everything remotely, sharing hardware may be possible.

---

Cloud storage - I can't think of a reason why one wouldn't.  GDPR even makes provision for "joint controllers" - but I wouldn't expect that would even be necessary.  A single monitor with removable / securable hard disk drive or cloud storage provides more than adequate separation and security of distinct data sets.

Having been through a clerk "resignation" (which resulted in a threat (from the clerk) of ind tribunal but quickly dissolved once it was made known that a fraud investigation would follow) and that that clerk took unilateral action to forensically wipe the PC laptop before departure, I'd suggest any OTHER than sole reliance on a single data storage solution.
Imagine a single clerk working for, say, 5 PCs (I don't know if that's feasible or not), that's 5 IT systems, 5 software packages, 5 licensing agreements, 5 printers and there is no real opportunity for any 1 PC to have any knowledge or visibility of what that clerk is drawing down from other PCs.

In the example I mention above about the "resignation", that individual was working more than 1 PC.  It was even thought that he was claiming more hours in total from the combined PC/TCs than were actually available in a working week.  Nice work if you can get it!

---

If the laptop user works off separate hard, secure cloud or Network drives for each authority and stores nothing on the C drive then the laptop could be being used in a GDPR  compliant manner.  But we don't actually know that is the case. Using one laptop for several authorities could cause other issues, for example if the clerk is off sick which deputy clerk from the authorities would get the use of it. The cost of a laptop is not prohibitive, and one per parish council takes away the possibility of GDPR compliance. Software costs may be reduced by using the right Office 365 licensing.

---

So there is a bit of a contradiction in your previous posts then?

"...all your cllrs have a duty to ensure the precept is spent prudently to avoid making a false declaration on your AGAR on the financial control questions..."

"...The Clerk should not use one laptop or on desktop to carry out their duties for multiple councils...This would be a breach of GDPR 2018 regulations..."
Cllr's should ensure prudent expenditure and this 'might' include exploring cost effective ways of utilising tech and IT.

The combined use of shared IT equipment across multiple PCs [of itself] does NOT create a breach of GDPR regs.

Answer 2

If the amount set aside in last year's budget was not used, it, or any remaining part of it, reverts to general reserve. If the intention was still to go ahead with the purchase, provision should have been made again in the new year's budget. If there is no provision for this expenditure in the current year's budget, but the council determines that the expenditure is necessary and appropriate, the council should agree and minute a virement of funds from general reserve to the appropriate accounting heading, in accordance with financial regulation 4.2, if you're using the current model. The tendering/quoting requirements of the financial regulations should be applied to each item of equipment on the shopping list, to ensure that best value is achieved.