Questions about town and parish councils
Follow Councillor Q&A on X/Twitter

Follow us on X/Twitter

0 votes
Our Parish Council frequently use Section 1(2) to exempt items from the public part of their meeting.  Recently there was a motion at the start of a meeting to move an item to the exempt meeting.  The item was discussion about correspondence with another public body and the reason given was that the correspondence was "open to misinterpretation".  One Cllr objected but was not supported and the item was moved.  The minutes report the Cllrs objection but not the reason given for the item being moved.  Was the reason stated, ie that the correspondence was "open to misinterpretation" a valid reason under the Act and should the minutes have recorded the reason given.

The agenda for the next full council meeting has now been posted and there is an item " To consider a new community asset opportunity" in Exempt business.  Should the council be providing more information in their agenda and an explanation as to how this item can be prejudicial to the public interest?  I have heard that some Cllrs are not aware of the details of this item.
by (120 points)

2 Answers

+2 votes
It sounds as though your council is over-using the power to exclude the press and public. The specific reasons permissible in this regard are listed in Schedule 12A of the Local Government Act 1972. Whatever reason is adopted, it must be clearly explained in the minutes.

On the face of it, if correspondence is open to misinterpretation, then care should be taken to ensure that it is fully and correctly explained in the meeting and the minutes thereof. If the community asset opportunity is subject to commercial confidentiality, perhaps because you are in competition with a neighbouring parish, there may be a case for exclusion of the press and public, but otherwise, it should be a public debate. Public support is normally a significant factor in the creation of community assets, so you'll struggle to show this if you hold your discussions behind closed doors.
by (52.9k points)
+3 votes
It is under the provisions of schedule 12 of the Local Govt Act 1972. It applies to items that are exempt or confidential and has to be subject to a resolution. It should be clear from the agenda papers why the exclusion is put to a resolution. Councils can't falsely apply it to avoid flak. There should be an explanation as to why it is judged prejudicial to the public interest, not an expectation that cllrs will just act like sheep and resolve it without question.
by (34.9k points)

Welcome to Town & Parish Councillor Q&A, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of the community. All genuine questions and answers are welcome. Follow us on Twitter to see the latest questions as they are asked - click on the image button above or follow @TownCouncilQA. Posts from new members may be delayed as we are unfortunately obliged to check each one for spam. Spammers will be blacklisted.

You may find the following links useful:

We have a privacy policy and a cookie policy.

Clares Cushions logo Peacock cushion

Clare's Cushions creates beautiful hand made cushions and home accessories from gorgeous comtemporary fabrics. We have a fantastic selection of prints including Sophie Allport and Orla Kiely designs and most covers can be ordered either alone or with a cushion inner. Buying new cushions is an affordable and effective way to update your home interior, they're also a great gift idea. Visit our site now

2,895 questions
5,615 answers
7,948 comments
10,028 users
Google Analytics Alternative