Frustrating that planning applications are 'listed' by the LPA in a manner which doesn't align with PC meetings - well maybe.
The presumption that an LPA 'has a knack' or a 'tendency' of validating and publishing planning applications in a sequence which is inconvenient to PCs is to fail to understand the role and functionality of a LPA and indicates a bunker mentality where simple routine operations of a partner organisation are not understood or 'blamed' for the effect upon the subordinate entity.
Planning APPLICANTS submit their planning applications entirely as suits them self - they may be waiting for architect, planning agent, ecologist, arboriculture, highways or any other manner of required supporting documentation - they are entirely at liberty to submit their planning application to the LPA when so ever they choose.
The validation desk will then have a series of checks before the application is passed validation and allocated to a case officer.
Only then will the application be publicly listed and consultees invited to comment.
This is an entirely randomised process starting from the completely arbitrary submission of an application which has no consideration of individual parish council meeting schedules.
It is futile and indicative of a bunker mentality to assume that there is an intentional act of LPA publishing applications according to anything other than the randomness of the applicant's action.