When I first started as a Councillor I was faced with dominant Chairmen who worked with a compliant clerk and you got what you were given with the Agenda ie there was no apparent way of getting things discussed if the Chairman didn’t want it . Then I discovered para 9 of our SOs which appeared to give an independent route to the Agenda but then had to deal with Clerk's power to set the Agenda. I then read in detail the Governance Toolkit and the Rules of debate from our SOs and in them it always referred to motions on the agenda. I then mused that this is not what happens at our meetings ie the agenda consists of list of subjects which are discussed and the chair usually comes up with a resolution which is voted on . However, it now appears to me that para 9 is in fact applicable to all motions not just one offs . In this context SOs usually says something like this
In accordance with standing order 3(b)(iii) above, no motion may be moved at a meeting unless it is included in the agenda and the mover has given written notice of its wording to the Council’s Proper Officer at least seven clear days before the next meeting.
This comes under the heading MOTIONS FOR A MEETING THAT REQUIRE WRITTEN NOTICE TO BE GIVEN TO THE PROPER OFFICER
The question is are there such things as motions that don’t require written notice . I cant see that there can be such a thing other than procedural ones
If I am correct this accords with my view that meetings should be moreso about making decisions and not being talking shops
Am I reading this right as my local CALC and clerk simply don’t reply as I guess they think I am some sort of nutter.
In summary I read it that in order to get a motion on the agenda (and get a resolution passed) the proposer has to do a lot of work beforehand and come up with proposed way forward in the form of a written motion which must in turn be included on the Agenda