So, still we see example of an ALC inappropriately assigning so called ‘confidentiality’ to Operation LONDON BRIDGE planning and policy documents.
On the one hand, the information cascade ‘should’ be coming to town and parish councils via first tier councils - yeah,right, nothing there.
But since ALC are distributing info via clerks with the express instruction NOT to share with Cllrs just goes to illustrate how incapable ALC is at applying any SENSE to avoid inappropriate document control caveats.
The whole purpose - over DECADES - of the bridge plans (of which there are many) is to enable planning, discreetly, before the principle actually dies.
In the case of Op LONDON BRIDGE, it ‘should’ now be obvious that the need for discretion is replaced by the need for ACTION and action relies upon information.
Op LONDON BRIDGE details should now be open source for the implementation of arrangements by town and parish councils.
Genuinely despair at the lack of sense on the part of certain organisations….