The items public excluded from were : Financial Matters:

Question

<!--[if gte mso 9]> <![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]> Normal 0 false false false EN-GB X-NONE X-NONE <![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]> <![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 10]> /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin-top:0cm; mso-para-margin-right:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:10.0pt; mso-para-margin-left:0cm; line-height:115%; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";} <![endif]-->

We were informed that the rest of the agenda was for Councillors only.

 

The agenda items where public excluded were:

2010/11 Audit

            Statement of Finances & Orders for Payment

Section 137 Payments/Donations (Mid year Payments)

Community Council Donation

     

Answer 1

Some of your question did not reproduce on my computer (I am not savvy with the technical jargon). From what I can read; there is absolutely no cause to exclude the public from these items and doing so is likely to give rise to public suspicion.