The discussion here has been side tracked into discussing the conduct of the clerk but I'd add that being of a certain age I recall the time when councillors could be suspended for poor conduct. There used to be a national standards board as well as a local one and the main sanction was to suspend a councillor, if allegations were proved, for a maximum period of 6 months (I believe). The Localism Act pretty much did away with that, replaced it with a local monitoring officer with no teeth whose only sanction is to wag a finger and request retraining with no come back if said councillor failed to attend. Whilst I accept there are those who would claim this is democratic (or the alternatives undemocratic), we've all seen those videos with such poor behaviour that proper and professional acts by councillors are thwarted by the odd one or two hellbent on being disruptive.