Questions about town and parish councils
Follow Councillor Q&A on X/Twitter

Follow us on X/Twitter

0 votes
Good Afternoon
May I have you views/comments please

We have been asked by  a resident, this will be on the agenda for next meeting, if we can undertake extra grass cutting for our county council  The land does not belong to the parish but our local authority.  Our authority has had issues this year and behind schedule  Normally they  do an excellent service of our hedgerows, green spaces and public footpaths  The resident is concerned mainly - the public footpaths.     If we do it this year are we setting a precedent for other areas that we are not responsible.  Its not a small task we have numerous public footpaths around our village,, will run into a few thousand pounds.
What are you views; and if we did do it what power could we actually use?

Thanks
by (1.5k points)

2 Answers

+1 vote
My view is if the county council want to hand over responsibility for the maintenance of the footpaths in your parish, they will have to pay you for it.  In my county, the county council suggested that parishes might want to take over this but the money offered was derisible as they had the benefit of volume of work on their side when paying a contractor to cover the whole of the county.

If you have general power of competence, you can use that power or alternatively the Highways Act 1980 s43 allows for parish councils to maintain footpaths but not relieve the responsibility of the other authority to maintain it too.
by (24.0k points)
thank you for taking the time for answering
+1 vote

There are a number of relevant issues which would be worthy of consideration.

If the land is owned by the county council, the PC would need to engage the landowner and seek consent / agreement prior to undertaking any works.

This is not an uncommon arrangement since many county councils will have sought to disaggregate the provision of non statutory responsibilities to town and parish councils over the years as part of ‘efficiency’ measures - public toilets, public rights of way (PRoW) etc, etc.

In relation to PRoW, the responsibility for maintenance falls to the local authority (LA) but may be disaggregated (if agreed by the lower tier council) under a Local Maintenance Arrangement (LMP.)

LMPs would normally take the form of something like:

LA agrees to:

  • Provide reimbursement for the work with a grant of £125.89 per kilometre per cut on gold paths and £50.36 per kilometre for silver paths. Also, a payment of £6.29 is made available for the cutting of isolated gates and stiles on gold paths
  • Provide technical advice and support to the local council
  • Carry out major structural works, such as replacing defective bridges, in line with published path priorities

The local Council agrees to:

  • Maintain Gold paths and cut Silver paths if necessary
  • Appoint a co-ordinator to liaise with the Operational Delivery Area Rangers. This can be the Clerk, a Councillor or any member of the local community
  • Submit claims for grant with supporting invoices
  • Check and hold copies of contractors' public liability insurance and training certificates

It’s a matter for consideration whether a lower tier council would accept and deliver the services on behalf of the LA - does the reimbursement make it worthwhile?  Would TC/PC be able or willing to provide the service at (at least equal to but preferably) greater standard?

Whilst that is a bit of an aside, it sets the scene for the art of the possible - the TC/PC ‘could’ if it wanted to, seek to take over the role completely - if a LMP arrangement existed.

Back to the exam question - should the PC do some ‘extras’ on behalf of the LA?  You’d have to have an arrangement if you wanted to and so it might be worth exploring the formal LMP route.

Should the PC assume a cost from precept that ‘should’ already be covered from CT?  Well, that’s one you’d have to justify to your electors.

Does the PC have the experience and capacity to undertake a competitive tender for the service provision or will it just be some bloke with a ride on mower?  (That is likely to be a bigger question than might immediately be obvious…)

And to top all of that off - PRoW are classic examples of where town and parish councils expose their complete inability and lack of capability to properly scope the requirement, tender the services, manage service delivery, monitor performance indicators and achieve value for money.  So much money is wasted by contracting services that either don’t need doing or are done inadequately.

PRoW responsibility lies with the county and they draw the funding for it from CT payers.  If you have a resident with a complaint / concern, I’d suggest PC should invite ward member to address the resident’s concern.  A LMP offer may fall from that.  

Does 1 or 2 people complaining to a PC, about a responsibility that falls to a county council, warrant the additional, un-forecast expenditure of parish precept?  Does your parish precept have sufficient funds to cover it?  Does your financial SOs allow emergent spend?

FWIW - I’d suggest forwarding it to county in the first instance. 

by (6.4k points)
Thank you for such a comprehensive reply.    The costs you have quoted are they specific for your council.  What is Gold and Silver ?
Those are the £ rates per km (should be mile now!) that Cornwall council pay to any town/parish that have entered into LMP arrangement.
Gold, Silver and bronze is the designation applied to individual PRoW according to their historical relevance, anticipated frequency of use etc. It’s just a prioritisation system which allows a higher £ rate for gold than silver etc so as to reflect the higher cost of more frequent maintenance schedule.
I’d be surprised if the £ rates were massively different across the country - actually, no I wouldn’t!
thanks for clarification.

Welcome to Town & Parish Councillor Q&A, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of the community. All genuine questions and answers are welcome. Follow us on Twitter to see the latest questions as they are asked - click on the image button above or follow @TownCouncilQA. Posts from new members may be delayed as we are unfortunately obliged to check each one for spam. Spammers will be blacklisted.

You may find the following links useful:

We have a privacy policy and a cookie policy.

Clares Cushions logo Peacock cushion

Clare's Cushions creates beautiful hand made cushions and home accessories from gorgeous comtemporary fabrics. We have a fantastic selection of prints including Sophie Allport and Orla Kiely designs and most covers can be ordered either alone or with a cushion inner. Buying new cushions is an affordable and effective way to update your home interior, they're also a great gift idea. Visit our site now

2,895 questions
5,617 answers
7,949 comments
10,028 users
Google Analytics Alternative