If a Cllr, or a member of public via FoI, wishes to understand the background to a “not minor” incident of gross misconduct leading to dismissal, why would it be appropriate to assume an obstructive stance - which is interpreted as the recommendation in other replies.
The start point should be OPENNESS unless there is a specific reason not to and even then, any redaction should be the absolute minimum to abide by specific exemptions.
It’s not for anyone to try and se Ind guess the reason why it is being requested that is irrelevant
Default absolutely must be release unless unequivocally prevented, by legislation, from doing so